Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
-
carlossanchez
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
@scott21 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
Tangent, but worth mentioning:
Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
Counterpoint:
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
Here's what I know on this:
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
Genuine beginner question -
Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
-
cynthia.muller
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
@jhansen From hands-on experience,
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
@cynthia.muller Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit.
Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth.
Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
This matches something I went through recently.
Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
-
barbara.jones
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm
Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?
Just to be precise about one thing:
Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days