Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by young56 »

From hands-on experience, Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
lbianchi
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by lbianchi »

@young56 That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by pierregreen »

@lbianchi Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
wei_ross
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:40 am

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by wei_ross »

@pierregreen I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
lbianchi
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by lbianchi »

@wei_ross This raises a question for me - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
wei_ross
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:40 am

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by wei_ross »

@lbianchi I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
james15
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:39 am

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by james15 »

@wei_ross Counterpoint: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
camila.jackson0
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by camila.jackson0 »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Building > buying.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by young56 »

@camila.jackson0 Speaking from personal experience here, Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
larrysokolov
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:23 pm

Re: Torque sensing integration - strain gauge placement tips?

Post by larrysokolov »

New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious - For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
he/him
Post Reply