How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
chenperez
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:51 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by chenperez »

@ssantos To answer this directly: Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Building > buying.
lbianchi
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by lbianchi »

Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them.
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by jhansen »

Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by mia_lars »

@jhansen Agreed, and I'd add: Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
sarah.santos3
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:30 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by sarah.santos3 »

@mia_lars This matches what I've seen too. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
they/them
rossi30
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:49 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by rossi30 »

Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
arjunsanchez
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2025 3:20 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by arjunsanchez »

I can speak to this a bit. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
diego.moore6
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 8:48 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by diego.moore6 »

Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Building > buying.
mary.taylor6
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:51 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by mary.taylor6 »

I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
lbianchi
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by lbianchi »

@mary.taylor6 To answer this directly: Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Post Reply