How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by karen.chen3 »

@yuki71 Appreciate the detailed answer. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
they/them
ethan17
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 8:21 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by ethan17 »

Just to be precise about one thing: A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
ethan.lewis5
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:35 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by ethan.lewis5 »

I'd frame this differently. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by byang »

@ethan.lewis5 Counterpoint: Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
rao91
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2025 1:55 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by rao91 »

From hands-on experience, Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
he/him
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by park44 »

@rao91 This raises a question for me - Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
she/her
ethan.lewis5
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:35 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by ethan.lewis5 »

@park44 I dealt with almost this exact situation. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by olga_lind »

Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
thomas65
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2026 11:59 am

Re: How much does wrist compliance reduce damage from failed grasp attempts?

Post by thomas65 »

This matches what I've seen too. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Post Reply