How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
joseph_sing
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:29 am

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by joseph_sing »

This is a great summary, thanks. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by ethan_fisc »

Genuine beginner question - In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
ananya.novak
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2026 9:07 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by ananya.novak »

I dealt with almost this exact situation. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
young58
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2025 6:16 am

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by young58 »

Just to be precise about one thing: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
they/them
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by emilyperez »

One nitpick - Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them.
lbianchi
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by lbianchi »

@emilyperez This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by yuki71 »

@lbianchi Agreed, and I'd add: Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
noah_pate
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:25 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by noah_pate »

Counterpoint: Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them.
scott.andersson5
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by scott.andersson5 »

@noah_pate That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: How do you evaluate in-hand slip detection reliability?

Post by williams84 »

Just to be precise about one thing: Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Post Reply