What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
+1 to this. Worth adding:
Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting. Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong -
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
-
zoeanderson
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@smartinez Minor factual note:
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
-
amandawhite
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2026 1:15 pm
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
Pretty much this. One thing to add:
DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
-
betty.king
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:37 am
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@amandawhite One nitpick -
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Solid-state battery claims from platforms like XPeng's IRON, GAC's GoMate, and EngineAI's T800 are genuinely promising on paper for energy density and safety margins, but independent, large-scale field validation of those runtime claims is still fairly limited as of 2026 - it's real progress, not yet fully proven at scale.
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@olga_lind Ran into exactly this myself.
Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting.
she/her
-
charlesbianchi
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@aliu Just to be precise about one thing:
Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs.
she/her
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@charlesbianchi One nitpick -
There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard. Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime.
she/her
-
gary.tanaka2
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:35 pm
Re: What's a battery safety incident (yours or one you read about) that changed how you design?
@lperez This lines up with my experience.
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs. Best-in-class lithium-ion cells used in humanoids are currently landing around 280-300 Wh/kg, which is respectable but still leaves battery mass as one of the largest single contributors to total robot weight.