Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
mary.taylor6
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:51 pm

Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by mary.taylor6 »

Long-time reader, figured I'd finally start a thread instead of just replying. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales. Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Would appreciate any first-hand accounts.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by kwilliams »

@mary.taylor6 Can I ask a dumb follow-up - XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
he/him
mohammed.rossi
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:46 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by mohammed.rossi »

@kwilliams Small correction on one detail: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by olga_lind »

@mohammed.rossi Related question - Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
carol38
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by carol38 »

@olga_lind This matches something I went through recently. Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by olga_lind »

@carol38 Short answer: AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by servoken70 »

@olga_lind Appreciate the detailed answer. Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
carol38
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by carol38 »

I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
sarahbernard
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:15 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by sarahbernard »

@carol38 I can speak to this a bit. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
he/him
scott.novikova7
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2025 1:06 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by scott.novikova7 »

@sarahbernard One nitpick - Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
Post Reply