Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
carol.robinson
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:36 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by carol.robinson »

This matches something I went through recently. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
they/them
ashley_flor
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 8:12 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by ashley_flor »

Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
greta78
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2026 8:34 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by greta78 »

Slightly off-topic, but related: 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
mia.weber
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:38 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by mia.weber »

@greta78 Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
garcia51
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by garcia51 »

I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
they/them
joseph_sing
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2025 2:29 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by joseph_sing »

I dealt with almost this exact situation. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by byang »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
robertmiller
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2026 4:05 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by robertmiller »

@byang This lines up with my experience. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by carlossanchez »

@robertmiller This lines up with my experience. Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: Anyone think Toyota's approach will look smarter in hindsight than the fast movers?

Post by olga_lind »

@carlossanchez Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
Post Reply