How do commercial humanoids handle actuator failure gracefully (or don't they)?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
kim37
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:21 pm

Re: How do commercial humanoids handle actuator failure gracefully (or don't they)?

Post by kim37 »

Minor factual note: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: How do commercial humanoids handle actuator failure gracefully (or don't they)?

Post by young56 »

Speaking from personal experience here, Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: How do commercial humanoids handle actuator failure gracefully (or don't they)?

Post by barbara50 »

One nitpick - Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
zoeanderson
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am

Re: How do commercial humanoids handle actuator failure gracefully (or don't they)?

Post by zoeanderson »

@barbara50 Agreed, and I'd add: Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
Post Reply