What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
-
barbara_liu
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:08 am
What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
Trying to organize my own thinking on this, so bear with me.
Group-buy arrangements for harder-to-source parts (small harmonic drives, precision bearings, custom PCBs) are a common way hobbyist communities work around the fact that specialty components are often only sold in industrial minimum-order quantities. The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
Happy to be told I'm wrong on any of this.
they/them
-
benjaminsanchez
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
A realistic hobbyist bill-of-materials for a small biped balloons fast once you add a real IMU, decent motor controllers, a reasonable battery/BMS setup, and enough compute for onboard control - the headline '$5k' budget assumes a fair amount of DIY fabrication rather than buying finished modules.
-
forgecam45
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 11:24 pm
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@benjaminsanchez I dealt with almost this exact situation.
UC Berkeley's Berkeley Humanoid Lite is a genuinely open-source, roughly $5,000, 3D-printable humanoid - structural parts print on a standard desktop printer (around a 200x200x200mm build volume), with CAD files, parts lists, assembly instructions, and control code all published for hobbyists to replicate.
he/him
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Building a scoped-down project first - a single leg, an arm, or a torso-only upper body - is a common and sensible way to learn the mechanical and control fundamentals before committing to the cost and complexity of a full bipedal platform.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
ethan.lewis5
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:35 pm
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@matthew43 Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful.
A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
Appreciate the detailed answer.
Starting in simulation (even a simplified physics sim of just the leg or the target gait) before touching real hardware is one of the more reliable ways to avoid destroying expensive parts while debugging balance and walking control from scratch.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
-
pierregreen
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@jlefebvre Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Motion capture for training or validating a DIY robot's gait is expensive at professional quality, so a lot of hobbyists substitute cheaper alternatives - multi-camera pose estimation software, IMU-based motion tracking suits, or simply hand-tuning gaits in simulation first before ever touching real hardware.
she/her
-
samuel.adams
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:21 am
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@pierregreen Slightly off-topic, but related:
Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
Building > buying.
-
forgecam45
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 11:24 pm
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@samuel.adams Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Joining an existing robotics community (FRC, university clubs, maker spaces) before going fully solo is a common and effective way to pick up practical fabrication and control skills faster than working entirely alone from tutorials.
he/him
Re: What's the cheapest reliable force sensor setup you've actually gotten working?
@forgecam45 I dealt with almost this exact situation.
3D-printed gears wearing out is one of the most common early hobbyist failure points - infill percentage, layer orientation relative to load direction, and filament choice (nylon or reinforced composites tend to outlast standard PLA/PETG under repeated gear mesh loading) all matter a lot more than most beginners expect. Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.