Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@chenperez Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles. 24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment.
she/her
-
camila.jackson0
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@scott21 Speaking from personal experience here,
In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.
Building > buying.
-
emilyperez
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
Just to be precise about one thing:
Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.
-
camila.jackson0
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@emilyperez Not sure I fully agree here.
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.
Building > buying.
-
emilyperez
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@camila.jackson0 Small correction on one detail:
RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
One nitpick -
A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design. A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
-
emilyperez
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
Appreciate the detailed answer.
Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@emilyperez Agreed, and I'd add:
How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job. A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
@matthew43 Can I ask a dumb follow-up -
Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile. In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.
Building > buying.
Re: Anyone track how visa sponsorship availability varies across the major companies?
Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit.
The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side.
Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
they/them