Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
-
sven.smith4
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Tangent, but worth mentioning:
How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
-
sven.wilson4
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:27 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
@sven.smith4 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well.
A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
-
sven.smith4
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
@sven.wilson4 I dealt with almost this exact situation.
A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Speaking from personal experience here,
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
he/him
-
nancy_lewi
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2025 1:11 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
Genuinely curious -
A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
barbara.jones
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
I'd frame this differently.
A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit.
In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become. How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
@byang I can speak to this a bit.
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
they/them
-
michaelroberts
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2026 8:34 pm
Re: Anyone gone the other direction - robotics industry back into pure software roles?
@garcia51 +1 to this. Worth adding:
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis. A commonly cited skill gap in new-grad applicants is practical systems integration experience - many candidates are individually strong in ML or in mechanical design, but comparatively few have hands-on experience getting perception, planning, and control to work together reliably on real hardware under time pressure.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."