Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by charlesbianchi »

Been meaning to post this for a while. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Interested to see if this matches what others are seeing.
she/her
kim37
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:21 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by kim37 »

@charlesbianchi Counterpoint: Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
harmonicjen60
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:12 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by harmonicjen60 »

@kim37 Agreed, and I'd add: Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
dubois35
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:01 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by dubois35 »

I see it a little differently. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
they/them
dchen
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:51 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by dchen »

@dubois35 I see it a little differently. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
amandawhite
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 13, 2026 1:15 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by amandawhite »

@dchen This matches something I went through recently. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by matthew43 »

@amandawhite Speaking from personal experience here, Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
ramirez77
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2025 9:39 pm

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by ramirez77 »

Pretty much this. One thing to add: For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
amara.brown
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2026 5:53 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by amara.brown »

Appreciate the detailed answer. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
jessica_faro
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Custom PCB motor drivers for small joint actuators - anyone done this?

Post by jessica_faro »

@amara.brown Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
they/them
Post Reply