How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
@nancy_lewi This matches something I went through recently.
Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis. A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential.
-
mary.taylor6
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:51 pm
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
@mia.weber Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here.
How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
-
sven.smith4
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it:
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
-
nancy_lewi
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2025 1:11 pm
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
I'd frame this differently.
A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
jessica_faro
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:26 am
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
@nancy_lewi I'd push back on this a bit.
Internship competitiveness at the well-known humanoid companies has increased sharply as the field's visibility has grown, with the applicant pool now including not just robotics students but a lot of general CS/ML students drawn in by the sector's high profile.
they/them
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
@jessica_faro I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly.
Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
he/him
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
@tmartin +1 to this. Worth adding:
Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
From hands-on experience,
Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements.
they/them
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
From what I've seen:
Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new.
Re: How do you evaluate whether a startup's equity offer is realistically worth anything?
This raises a question for me -
A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design. Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field.