IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

IMUs, force/torque sensors, depth cameras, LiDAR, tactile skin, SLAM, and state estimation.
dchen
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:51 am

Re: IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

Post by dchen »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem. Proprioception (the robot's sense of its own joint angles, velocities, and forces) tends to get less attention than flashy vision systems, even though a lot of balance and manipulation failures trace back to proprioceptive noise or miscalibration rather than a vision problem.
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

Post by barbara50 »

Small correction on one detail: IMU drift over time (bias instability) is usually the real culprit behind slowly diverging state estimates, not noise - it's typically handled with sensor fusion against other references (visual odometry, joint kinematics) rather than trying to eliminate drift at the source. SLAM in a working warehouse is harder than in a controlled lab mainly because the map keeps changing - pallets move, people walk through, lighting shifts near dock doors - so a lot of production systems lean on semi-static maps refreshed periodically rather than pure continuous SLAM.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
choi98
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:32 am

Re: IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

Post by choi98 »

Counterpoint: Proprioception (the robot's sense of its own joint angles, velocities, and forces) tends to get less attention than flashy vision systems, even though a lot of balance and manipulation failures trace back to proprioceptive noise or miscalibration rather than a vision problem.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
jonathan.rao1
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:58 pm

Re: IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

Post by jonathan.rao1 »

Genuinely curious - Sensor fusion mostly earns its keep by covering for each individual sensor's weaknesses - vision struggles with occlusion and lighting, IMUs drift, force/torque sensors are noisy at low loads - fusing them gives a more robust estimate than any one source alone, independent of raw compute.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: IMU drift is killing my state estimation - anyone solved this cleanly?

Post by nicole57 »

This raises a question for me - IMU drift over time (bias instability) is usually the real culprit behind slowly diverging state estimates, not noise - it's typically handled with sensor fusion against other references (visual odometry, joint kinematics) rather than trying to eliminate drift at the source.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
Post Reply