SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
This is a great summary, thanks.
Estimating joint torque from motor current draw is cheap and requires no extra sensor, but it's less accurate than a dedicated torque sensor because it doesn't capture friction losses through the gearbox - good enough for coarse control, not always for precise force-controlled tasks. Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem.
Building > buying.
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@chenperez I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly.
Estimating joint torque from motor current draw is cheap and requires no extra sensor, but it's less accurate than a dedicated torque sensor because it doesn't capture friction losses through the gearbox - good enough for coarse control, not always for precise force-controlled tasks. Sensor fusion mostly earns its keep by covering for each individual sensor's weaknesses - vision struggles with occlusion and lighting, IMUs drift, force/torque sensors are noisy at low loads - fusing them gives a more robust estimate than any one source alone, independent of raw compute.
she/her
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@scott21 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly.
Force/torque sensors near the ankle give a direct read on ground reaction forces, which is valuable for balance control, but they add cost, a failure point, and routing complexity right at a joint that already takes the most mechanical abuse. Event cameras (which report per-pixel brightness changes rather than full frames) are still more of a research curiosity than a production sensor for humanoids, mainly because the software ecosystem and processing pipelines around them are far less mature than for standard frame-based cameras.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@mia_lars I can speak to this a bit.
Unitree's Dex3-1 dexterous hand packs around 33 pressure/tactile sensors per hand across the fingers and palm, capable of sensing pressure roughly in the 10g-2500g range - a useful reference point for what 'production tactile sensing' looks like right now.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
zoeanderson
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
Just to be precise about one thing:
Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments.
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@zoeanderson This raises a question for me -
Estimating joint torque from motor current draw is cheap and requires no extra sensor, but it's less accurate than a dedicated torque sensor because it doesn't capture friction losses through the gearbox - good enough for coarse control, not always for precise force-controlled tasks.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
-
zoeanderson
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
Slight correction, though the overall point stands:
Force/torque sensors near the ankle give a direct read on ground reaction forces, which is valuable for balance control, but they add cost, a failure point, and routing complexity right at a joint that already takes the most mechanical abuse.
-
tariqlarsen
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:28 pm
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@zoeanderson Counterpoint:
Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
This matches what I've seen too.
Proprioception (the robot's sense of its own joint angles, velocities, and forces) tends to get less attention than flashy vision systems, even though a lot of balance and manipulation failures trace back to proprioceptive noise or miscalibration rather than a vision problem.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
-
ashley_flor
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 8:12 pm
Re: SLAM in dynamic warehouse environments - what's actually working in 2026?
@young56 I can speak to this a bit.
Vibration is one of the most underrated sources of noisy IMU and tactile readings - mounting matters as much as sensor quality, and a poorly isolated mount can add more noise than the sensor's own datasheet specs would suggest.