Encoder vs IMU-based joint angle estimation - which do you trust more?
-
mohammed.rossi
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 9:46 pm
Re: Encoder vs IMU-based joint angle estimation - which do you trust more?
Agreed, and I'd add:
IMU drift over time (bias instability) is usually the real culprit behind slowly diverging state estimates, not noise - it's typically handled with sensor fusion against other references (visual odometry, joint kinematics) rather than trying to eliminate drift at the source.
Re: Encoder vs IMU-based joint angle estimation - which do you trust more?
I'd frame this differently.
Sensor fusion mostly earns its keep by covering for each individual sensor's weaknesses - vision struggles with occlusion and lighting, IMUs drift, force/torque sensors are noisy at low loads - fusing them gives a more robust estimate than any one source alone, independent of raw compute.
they/them
Re: Encoder vs IMU-based joint angle estimation - which do you trust more?
@ssantos Minor factual note:
Unitree's Dex3-1 dexterous hand packs around 33 pressure/tactile sensors per hand across the fingers and palm, capable of sensing pressure roughly in the 10g-2500g range - a useful reference point for what 'production tactile sensing' looks like right now.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Re: Encoder vs IMU-based joint angle estimation - which do you trust more?
Small correction on one detail:
Tactile skin arrays have improved a lot, but 'good enough to matter' really depends on the task - coarse contact detection across a large area is fairly mature, while fine, high-resolution force distribution sensing (like a human fingertip) is still the harder problem.
he/him