Anyone measured real-world tactile sensor degradation over months of use?

IMUs, force/torque sensors, depth cameras, LiDAR, tactile skin, SLAM, and state estimation.
ramirez77
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2025 9:39 pm

Re: Anyone measured real-world tactile sensor degradation over months of use?

Post by ramirez77 »

Genuine beginner question - SLAM in a working warehouse is harder than in a controlled lab mainly because the map keeps changing - pallets move, people walk through, lighting shifts near dock doors - so a lot of production systems lean on semi-static maps refreshed periodically rather than pure continuous SLAM.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
rivera14
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2026 1:48 am

Re: Anyone measured real-world tactile sensor degradation over months of use?

Post by rivera14 »

Here's what I know on this: Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Anyone measured real-world tactile sensor degradation over months of use?

Post by kwilliams »

Just to be precise about one thing: Vibration is one of the most underrated sources of noisy IMU and tactile readings - mounting matters as much as sensor quality, and a poorly isolated mount can add more noise than the sensor's own datasheet specs would suggest. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
he/him
Post Reply