What actually counts as a humanoid robot at this point?

Open discussion on humanoid robots, the field in general, and anything that doesn't fit the boxes below.
sharonschmidt
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am

Re: What actually counts as a humanoid robot at this point?

Post by sharonschmidt »

@choi98 Short answer: A lot of the current wave genuinely is repackaged 2000s and 2010s research (ZMP walking, whole-body control, DARPA-era grasping) combined with two things that weren't available then: cheap high-torque-density actuators and large-scale learned policies. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: What actually counts as a humanoid robot at this point?

Post by matthew43 »

Just to be precise about one thing: The labor-substitution narrative gets simplified a lot in pitch decks; the more honest framing right now is 'augmenting understaffed, high-turnover roles' rather than wholesale replacement. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply