Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by kwilliams »

@emilyperez One nitpick - A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
he/him
zoeanderson
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by zoeanderson »

@kwilliams Minor factual note: Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by matthew43 »

@zoeanderson Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
scott.andersson5
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by scott.andersson5 »

Side note that might be relevant: In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by kwilliams »

@scott.andersson5 Speaking from personal experience here, A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
he/him
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by servoken70 »

@kwilliams This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
deborahperez
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by deborahperez »

Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by kwilliams »

@deborahperez Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
he/him
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by williams84 »

@kwilliams Here's what I know on this: Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Teleoperation for manipulation data collection - what rigs are people using?

Post by emilyperez »

Just to be precise about one thing: In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Post Reply