Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by cynthia.muller »

To answer this directly: Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by kwilliams »

Agreed, and I'd add: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
he/him
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by barbara50 »

@kwilliams Related question - Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by servoken70 »

@barbara50 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by pierregreen »

@servoken70 Just to be precise about one thing: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
she/her
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by williams84 »

@pierregreen Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
chloe_jack
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by chloe_jack »

@williams84 Speaking from personal experience here, Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
mia.weber
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:38 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by mia.weber »

@chloe_jack Side note that might be relevant: Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by charlesbianchi »

@mia.weber Agreed, and I'd add: Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
she/her
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Anyone compare payload capacity across current dexterous hands?

Post by scott21 »

Agreed, and I'd add: Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
she/her
Post Reply