Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@olga_lind One nitpick - Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by cynthia.muller »

@benjaminsanchez This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by yuki71 »

I see it a little differently. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by kwilliams »

Pretty much this. One thing to add: Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
he/him
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by jhansen »

Genuine beginner question - Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
sharonschmidt
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:31 am

Re: Tactile fingertip wear and tear - how long do sensors actually last in daily use?

Post by sharonschmidt »

Short answer: Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
Post Reply