What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@camila.jackson0 Just to be precise about one thing: In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

Post by kwilliams »

@benjaminsanchez Just to be precise about one thing: Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
he/him
jwang
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:28 pm

Re: What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

Post by jwang »

@kwilliams Appreciate the detailed answer. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

Post by pierregreen »

I dealt with almost this exact situation. Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
she/her
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: What's the deal with soft robotic grippers for humanoids specifically?

Post by matthew43 »

Not sure I fully agree here. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply