Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

This has been on my mind since a conversation I had last week. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles. Would love to hear from anyone with hands-on experience here.
carol.robinson
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:36 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by carol.robinson »

@benjaminsanchez Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget.
they/them
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by jhansen »

@carol.robinson Short answer: Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by ethan_fisc »

Sorry if this is a basic question, but Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
barbara.jones
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by barbara.jones »

@ethan_fisc Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by matthew43 »

From what I've seen: Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by ethan_fisc »

I can speak to this a bit. Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by olga_lind »

@ethan_fisc This lines up with my experience. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by pierregreen »

This matches something I went through recently. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
she/her
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Grasp failure recovery - do current systems even detect a dropped object reliably?

Post by jhansen »

Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
Post Reply