Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
sarah.santos3
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:30 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by sarah.santos3 »

Follow-up question though - Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
they/them
mohammed64
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:56 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by mohammed64 »

@sarah.santos3 Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Figure's fourth-generation Dexterous Hand (on Figure 02/03) reportedly offers 16 degrees of freedom per hand with sensors integrated into each finger, aimed at fine force control tasks like handling small electronic components without crushing them. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by williams84 »

Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
ashley_flor
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri May 09, 2025 8:12 pm

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by ashley_flor »

@williams84 Short answer: Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab. Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
arjunsanchez
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2025 3:20 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by arjunsanchez »

Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by mia_lars »

Speaking from personal experience here, Payload-to-hand-weight ratio varies a lot across current dexterous hands, and it's a meaningful tradeoff - more DoF and finer sensing generally means more actuators and mass in the hand itself, which eats into the arm's usable payload budget. Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
matthew.yamamoto0
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2025 8:43 pm

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by matthew.yamamoto0 »

Small correction on one detail: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by williams84 »

Side note that might be relevant: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by matthew43 »

@williams84 This raises a question for me - Bimanual manipulation - two arms coordinating on one task - is harder than it looks mostly because of the added degrees of freedom and the timing/force coordination required; a lot of 'two-handed' demos are actually closer to two independent single-hand tasks done in sequence.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
choi98
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:32 am

Re: Anyone quantified the actual payload-to-hand-weight ratio across platforms?

Post by choi98 »

Minor factual note: Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Post Reply