Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
Agreed, and I'd add:
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself.
-
samuel.adams
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:21 am
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
@jwang This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve. Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
Building > buying.
-
ethan.lewis5
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:35 pm
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
@samuel.adams Just to be precise about one thing:
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
-
ethan_fisc
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
Genuine beginner question -
Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
@ethan_fisc Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well.
In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
@lbianchi Counterpoint:
Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
-
sarahbernard
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:15 pm
Re: Anyone using capacitive vs piezoresistive tactile sensors on fingertips - preferences?
@ethan17 This is a great summary, thanks.
Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
he/him