What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

Post by williams84 »

@arjunsanchez That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
sven.wilson4
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:27 pm

Re: What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

Post by sven.wilson4 »

@williams84 Small correction on one detail: Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

Post by charlesbianchi »

@sven.wilson4 Just to be precise about one thing: Vision-based grasp confidence estimation (predicting success before attempting a grasp) and tactile-based confirmation (confirming after contact) are complementary rather than competing - vision helps you choose a grasp, tactile tells you if it actually worked.
she/her
jessica_faro
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:26 am

Re: What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

Post by jessica_faro »

I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism. A lot of the manipulation shown in production demos still leans heavily on teleoperation, particularly for anything involving fine force control or novel objects - autonomous grasp success rates on genuinely unstructured, previously-unseen clutter are still well below what teleoperation can achieve.
they/them
olga_lind
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2024 12:11 pm

Re: What's the current gold standard dataset for training grasp policies?

Post by olga_lind »

@jessica_faro This matches what I've seen too. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Post Reply