Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
-
deborahperez
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am
Re: Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
Genuine beginner question -
Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
Re: Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
@deborahperez Here's what I know on this:
Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
he/him
-
williams84
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am
Re: Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
This is a great summary, thanks.
Distributed power architectures (multiple smaller packs or local capacitor buffering near high-draw actuators) can reduce peak current demands on the main bus and improve fault isolation, at the cost of added complexity versus a single central pack. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Re: Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
This lines up with my experience.
DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too. Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting.
he/him
-
camila.jackson0
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am
Re: Solid-state batteries in humanoids - real progress or still mostly PR?
I dealt with almost this exact situation.
Regenerative braking on humanoid joints can recover some energy during deceleration phases of walking, but the actual energy recovered is modest compared to a vehicle, since humanoid joints don't sustain the same continuous high-speed rotation that makes regen worthwhile in EVs.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Building > buying.