How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Battery chemistry, pack design, BMS, runtime, charging/swapping, and keeping actuators from cooking themselves.
smartinez
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2025 2:55 am

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by smartinez »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. DC-DC conversion losses across all the individual actuator drivers add up across a whole robot - it's a less glamorous efficiency question than battery chemistry, but power electronics efficiency meaningfully affects real-world runtime too.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by emilyperez »

@smartinez Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Fast charging accelerates capacity fade over repeated cycles, so fleet operators generally have to choose between minimizing downtime (fast charging) and maximizing pack lifespan (slower charging or swap-based approaches) rather than getting both for free.
gary.tanaka2
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:35 pm

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by gary.tanaka2 »

I can speak to this a bit. Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
shill
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:09 pm

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by shill »

@gary.tanaka2 This is a great summary, thanks. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
james15
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:39 am

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by james15 »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Higher-voltage power architectures reduce resistive losses and current draw through the wiring harness for a given power level, which is part of why some newer platforms are moving away from lower-voltage packs as total system power demand climbs.
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by byang »

I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Hot-swappable battery packs solve the runtime bottleneck for continuous operations (like a 24/7 warehouse shift) without needing a much bigger, heavier pack, but they add mechanical complexity, a failure-prone connector interface, and logistics overhead for managing spare packs. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
ethan17
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 8:21 pm

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by ethan17 »

Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. Tesla's Optimus Gen 2 reportedly carries roughly a 2.3 kWh pack and manages about two hours of dynamic work, while Unitree's H1 runs a smaller 0.864 kWh pack good for under four hours of largely static operation - a useful illustration of how battery size and workload type both drive runtime. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by young56 »

@ethan17 Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. Thermal margin in a densely packed humanoid chassis is often the real limiting factor on sustained performance, not raw motor power - actuators get thermally throttled well before they'd hit their absolute torque limits, especially during repeated high-load cycles like continuous lifting. A BMS (battery management system) has to guard against transient current spikes from sudden gait changes or lifting motions, not just steady-state draw - peak current headroom and fast-acting protection logic matter as much as total capacity for real-world duty cycles.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
wei_ross
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:40 am

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by wei_ross »

@young56 Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Solid-state battery claims from platforms like XPeng's IRON, GAC's GoMate, and EngineAI's T800 are genuinely promising on paper for energy density and safety margins, but independent, large-scale field validation of those runtime claims is still fairly limited as of 2026 - it's real progress, not yet fully proven at scale. Idle/standing power draw is often surprisingly close to a meaningful fraction of active walking power draw once you account for onboard compute, sensors, and balance-holding torque - 'doing nothing' still costs real energy on a humanoid.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: How much heat actually comes from the motor windings vs the gearbox friction?

Post by jhansen »

@wei_ross I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. There's no widely standardized safety certification specific to humanoid battery packs yet in most jurisdictions - deployments generally lean on adapted versions of existing standards for industrial battery systems and electrical safety rather than a purpose-built humanoid standard.
Post Reply