How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by scott21 »

@carlossanchez This raises a question for me - Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
she/her
dubois35
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:01 pm

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by dubois35 »

@scott21 Genuinely curious - XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
they/them
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by scott21 »

@dubois35 Not sure I fully agree here. AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
she/her
rossi30
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:49 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by rossi30 »

Just to be precise about one thing: Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by jhansen »

@rossi30 Not sure I fully agree here. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by matthew43 »

Just to be precise about one thing: AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by karen.chen3 »

This lines up with my experience. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
they/them
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by scott21 »

@karen.chen3 Just to be precise about one thing: Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
she/her
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by mia_lars »

Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide. Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: How does Sanctuary AI's approach differ from the Tesla/Figure playbook?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@mia_lars Related question - Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
Post Reply