Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
tariqlarsen
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:28 pm

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by tariqlarsen »

Side note that might be relevant: XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
betty.king
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:37 am

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by betty.king »

@tariqlarsen This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running. Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
scott.novikova7
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2025 1:06 am

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by scott.novikova7 »

@betty.king I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide. Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
emily.kumar
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2026 2:42 pm

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by emily.kumar »

Related question - 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
gary.tanaka2
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 2:35 pm

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by gary.tanaka2 »

@emily.kumar I see it a little differently. Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by carlossanchez »

@gary.tanaka2 Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
richard36
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2025 9:43 am

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by richard36 »

@carlossanchez Ran into exactly this myself. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
joseph31
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:33 pm

Re: Which company's teleoperation reliance seems highest based on what's public?

Post by joseph31 »

This matches something I went through recently. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
he/him
Post Reply