Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Tesla Optimus, Boston Dynamics Atlas, Figure, Unitree, Agility Digit, Apptronik Apollo, 1X, and everyone else building these things.
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by byang »

@gary.tanaka2 Counterpoint: XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
gimbalmar65
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by gimbalmar65 »

To answer this directly: AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
brian.campbell
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:10 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by brian.campbell »

Sorry if this is a basic question, but Figure AI's robot ran on the BMW Spartanburg production line for roughly eleven months, contributing to more than 30,000 vehicle production cycles, ahead of an announced follow-on deployment at BMW's Leipzig plant.
scott.novikova7
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2025 1:06 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by scott.novikova7 »

@brian.campbell This matches what I've seen too. Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
dchen
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:51 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by dchen »

@scott.novikova7 Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
hill23
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2025 11:15 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by hill23 »

This matches something I went through recently. XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
barbara_liu
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:08 am

Re: Toyota's approach to humanoids compared to the pure-play startups

Post by barbara_liu »

@hill23 Side note that might be relevant: Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
they/them
Post Reply