Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
-
samuel.adams
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2026 3:21 am
Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
Genuinely split on this one, wanted outside opinions.
Fourier Intelligence's GR series and PAL Robotics both represent longer-running robotics companies (rather than recent startups) entering or continuing in the humanoid space, which brings real hardware experience but also legacy processes that newer, venture-funded competitors don't have to work around. 1X's NEO platform is notable for explicitly targeting home use rather than only industrial deployment, which is a meaningfully different (and arguably harder) engineering and safety target than warehouse or factory-floor robots. Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
Curious to hear how others see this.
Building > buying.
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@samuel.adams Agreed, and I'd add:
AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Tesla reportedly deployed more than 1,000 Optimus Gen 3 units into its own Fremont, Austin, and Berlin factories starting around January 2026, with a stated capacity target near 100,000 units for the year - it's worth noting these are internal factory deployments, not confirmed third-party commercial sales.
This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
-
cynthia.muller
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@richard36 To answer this directly:
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas (launched for Hyundai factory pilots) fully replaced the older hydraulic Atlas platform's actuation with electric quasi-direct-drive joints, resulting in a quieter, lighter robot with comparable or better dynamic performance for the pilot use cases.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
-
chloe_jack
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
Slightly off-topic, but related:
Total humanoid robotics funding from 2023 through early 2026 across major companies, smaller startups, and corporate R&D programs is estimated at more than $12 billion, illustrating how fast capital has piled into the sector in a short window.
Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
-
ethan_fisc
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
Sorry if this is a basic question, but
Apptronik raised a $520 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation (bringing total funding to roughly $935 million), with its Apollo humanoid reportedly being tested by Mercedes-Benz - a notable data point for how much capital a single humanoid startup can now attract. Automotive manufacturers - BMW, Mercedes, BYD, Geely, and Toyota among them - have become some of the most important early adopters, largely because their factories already have the structured environments and safety processes that make early humanoid deployment more tractable.
-
harmonicjen60
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:12 am
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@ethan_fisc Short answer:
XPeng's IRON humanoid debuted with a solid-state battery, part of a broader trend of Chinese entrants (alongside GAC's GoMate and EngineAI's T800) pushing energy-density and runtime claims that Western competitors haven't yet matched in announced specs.
Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
-
sarahbernard
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:15 pm
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@harmonicjen60 One nitpick -
Agility Robotics' Digit is operating in Amazon fulfillment centers and GXO warehouses moving totes, backed by a factory with roughly 10,000 units of annual production capacity - one of the more mature commercial-scale logistics deployments as of 2026.
he/him
-
scott.novikova7
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2025 1:06 am
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@sarahbernard I can speak to this a bit.
Estimated total operational commercial humanoids worldwide sit around 7,000-8,000 units as of mid-2026, broken down roughly as Optimus Gen 3 (1,000+), Unitree (5,500+ cumulative), Agility Digit (~250), Apptronik Apollo (~80), and Figure (~150) - useful context for how early-stage 'commercial scale' still is industry-wide.
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@scott.novikova7 Pretty much this. One thing to add:
Unitree's G1 humanoid starts at roughly $16,000, a price point well below full-size US-built humanoid platforms, and the company reportedly sold around 5,500 units - a meaningful data point in how aggressively Chinese manufacturers are pushing the price floor down.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
-
mohammed64
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:56 am
Re: Which platform has the best developer/research access if you wanted to build on top of it?
@deborah59 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified.
AgiBot reportedly sold around 5,168 units, putting it roughly in the same commercial volume range as Unitree among Chinese manufacturers, and worth watching alongside the more internationally recognized Chinese players. Sanctuary AI has taken an approach more explicitly centered on teleoperation-driven data collection and cognitive architecture research, which is a meaningfully different bet than the manufacturing-scale-first playbook Tesla and Figure are running.
Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days