Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Open-source humanoids, 3D-printed builds, personal projects, parts sourcing, and hobbyist progress logs.
chloe_jack
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by chloe_jack »

@servoken70 Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by pierregreen »

@chloe_jack That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Building a scoped-down project first - a single leg, an arm, or a torso-only upper body - is a common and sensible way to learn the mechanical and control fundamentals before committing to the cost and complexity of a full bipedal platform. Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build.
she/her
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by emilyperez »

Short answer: Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead.
jonathan.rao1
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:58 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by jonathan.rao1 »

I'd frame this differently. A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by kwilliams »

Small correction on one detail: Joining an existing robotics community (FRC, university clubs, maker spaces) before going fully solo is a common and effective way to pick up practical fabrication and control skills faster than working entirely alone from tutorials.
he/him
zoeanderson
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by zoeanderson »

@kwilliams Minor factual note: The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget. Building a scoped-down project first - a single leg, an arm, or a torso-only upper body - is a common and sensible way to learn the mechanical and control fundamentals before committing to the cost and complexity of a full bipedal platform.
chloe_jack
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by chloe_jack »

@zoeanderson From what I've seen: A first successful unassisted walk, from a standing start on a from-scratch project, commonly takes many months of part-time weekend work even for someone with a solid mechanical and software background - it's a genuinely hard milestone, not a weekend project.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by servoken70 »

@chloe_jack Agreed, and I'd add: A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably. Joining an existing robotics community (FRC, university clubs, maker spaces) before going fully solo is a common and effective way to pick up practical fabrication and control skills faster than working entirely alone from tutorials.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by jhansen »

@servoken70 From hands-on experience, A recurring lesson from hobbyist build logs: thermal management gets ignored until an actuator overheats and damages its own mounting hardware, at which point everyone suddenly starts caring about airflow and duty-cycle limits. Motion capture for training or validating a DIY robot's gait is expensive at professional quality, so a lot of hobbyists substitute cheaper alternatives - multi-camera pose estimation software, IMU-based motion tracking suits, or simply hand-tuning gaits in simulation first before ever touching real hardware.
chloe_jack
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Berkeley Humanoid Lite - anyone actually built one yet?

Post by chloe_jack »

@jhansen This is a great summary, thanks. Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead. Starting in simulation (even a simplified physics sim of just the leg or the target gait) before touching real hardware is one of the more reliable ways to avoid destroying expensive parts while debugging balance and walking control from scratch.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
Post Reply