3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Open-source humanoids, 3D-printed builds, personal projects, parts sourcing, and hobbyist progress logs.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by carlossanchez »

Thanks for laying this out, genuinely useful. Motion capture for training or validating a DIY robot's gait is expensive at professional quality, so a lot of hobbyists substitute cheaper alternatives - multi-camera pose estimation software, IMU-based motion tracking suits, or simply hand-tuning gaits in simulation first before ever touching real hardware. A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by ethan_fisc »

Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. A first successful unassisted walk, from a standing start on a from-scratch project, commonly takes many months of part-time weekend work even for someone with a solid mechanical and software background - it's a genuinely hard milestone, not a weekend project. The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget.
gimbalmar65
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by gimbalmar65 »

Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Jetson-class boards remain a common choice for onboard compute on hobbyist builds needing real vision or learned-policy inference, while a Raspberry Pi is often adequate for lower-level joint control and telemetry if the heavier compute is offloaded to a base station. A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
johnrossi
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:39 am

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by johnrossi »

Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. Joining an existing robotics community (FRC, university clubs, maker spaces) before going fully solo is a common and effective way to pick up practical fabrication and control skills faster than working entirely alone from tutorials. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
she/her
mary.taylor6
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2025 10:51 pm

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by mary.taylor6 »

@johnrossi Appreciate the detailed answer. Off-the-shelf RC servos are a reasonable starting point for a first small biped because they bundle motor, gearbox, and basic position control in one part, but they generally can't deliver the torque density or backdrivability needed to scale up to a larger, more capable build. A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably.
chloe_jack
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:42 pm

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by chloe_jack »

@mary.taylor6 From what I've seen: Sourcing small, precise harmonic drives as an individual hobbyist is genuinely difficult - most manufacturers focus on industrial customers with large order volumes, which is why a fair number of DIY builds substitute cycloidal drives, planetary gearboxes, or belt-reduction stages instead. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
karen_kim
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2025 11:18 pm

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by karen_kim »

One nitpick - Starting in simulation (even a simplified physics sim of just the leg or the target gait) before touching real hardware is one of the more reliable ways to avoid destroying expensive parts while debugging balance and walking control from scratch.
chenperez
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:51 pm

Re: 3D printed gears wearing out fast - anyone found a better filament/infill combo?

Post by chenperez »

@karen_kim Can I ask a dumb follow-up - The Berkeley Humanoid Lite stands about 1 meter tall and weighs roughly 16 kg, which is a genuinely reasonable target size for a first serious hobbyist build - big enough to be a real bipedal platform, small enough to not need industrial-scale actuators or a huge budget. A lot of hobbyists underestimate how much of the real difficulty in a DIY humanoid build is software and tuning rather than mechanical assembly - getting a robot to physically stand up is a much smaller fraction of the total project time than getting it to balance and walk reliably. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Building > buying.
Post Reply