What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Getting into the field, degree paths, labs, papers, internships, and career/salary discussion.
garcia51
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by garcia51 »

@byang Genuinely curious - Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field.
they/them
wei_ross
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:40 am

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by wei_ross »

This lines up with my experience. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
forgesve15
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2026 4:32 am

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by forgesve15 »

@wei_ross Small correction on one detail: Companies like Figure, 1X, Apptronik, and Agility Robotics are reportedly pulling senior ROS, controls, and learning engineers directly out of warehouse-automation and industrial-robotics roles - a sign of real talent competition between adjacent industries, not just fresh grads entering the field.
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by jhansen »

Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences. Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
nancy_lewi
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2025 1:11 pm

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by nancy_lewi »

Ran into exactly this myself. RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
johnrossi
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:39 am

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by johnrossi »

Not sure I fully agree here. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
smuller
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 3:29 pm

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by smuller »

I'd frame this differently. A whole-body control engineer's day-to-day work is a mix of formulating and tuning constrained optimization problems, debugging why a controller behaves differently on hardware than in simulation, and a surprising amount of time spent on numerical stability and solver performance rather than pure algorithm design. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
forgecam45
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 11:24 pm

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by forgecam45 »

This matches something I went through recently. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles. Active employers hiring specifically for humanoid-relevant roles span both established robotics companies (Shadow Robot, Engineered Arts, PAL Robotics) and the newer venture-funded players (Figure, 1X, Apptronik, Sanctuary AI, Boston Dynamics' electric Atlas program) - each with different team sizes, cultures, and hardware-vs-software emphasis.
he/him
greta.carter
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2026 9:12 pm

Re: What's it actually like working at a company doing 24/7 factory pilots - burnout risk?

Post by greta.carter »

@forgecam45 Appreciate the detailed answer. A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential.
they/them
Post Reply