Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Getting into the field, degree paths, labs, papers, internships, and career/salary discussion.
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by ethan_fisc »

@chloe.harris7 I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Transitioning from industrial automation into humanoid-specific roles is a increasingly common and viable path, since a lot of the underlying skills (motion control, safety systems, real-time software) transfer directly, even though the specific dynamics and learned-control components are new. 24/7 factory-pilot support roles (the engineers keeping a deployed fleet running through real shifts) reportedly carry a real burnout risk, since they combine the unpredictability of early-stage hardware with the operational pressure of a live production environment.
diego.moore6
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 8:48 am

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by diego.moore6 »

Not sure I fully agree here. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles. In the UK, base salaries for robotics roles reportedly range from around £50,000 for new graduates up to roughly £200,000 for senior whole-body-control or reinforcement-learning specialists - a notably wide band reflecting how specialized the top end of the field has become.
Building > buying.
shill
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:09 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by shill »

@diego.moore6 One nitpick - How much ML background a controls role actually requires varies a lot by company and team - some whole-body control positions remain heavily classical-optimization-focused, while others increasingly expect familiarity with reinforcement learning or imitation learning even for what used to be a purely classical-controls job.
karentaylor
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed May 27, 2026 5:10 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by karentaylor »

Not sure I fully agree here. RSS (Robotics: Science and Systems), ICRA, and the IEEE-RAS Humanoids conference are commonly cited as the most directly relevant venues for someone specifically interested in legged locomotion and humanoid control research, as opposed to broader AI/ML conferences. A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in.
shill
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2025 3:09 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by shill »

@karentaylor Appreciate the detailed answer. A strong, well-documented personal project (even a modest DIY build or a solid simulation-based RL project) reportedly carries real weight in hiring for this field, partly because the field is young enough that a demonstrated hands-on track record can meaningfully substitute for a less-relevant formal credential. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by yuki71 »

@shill From what I've seen: The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by yuki71 »

I'd frame this differently. Robotics engineers in the US were reportedly seeing $150k-$205k total comp at mid-level and $205k-$300k at senior level in 2026, with humanoid- and foundation-model-specialist roles clearing $280k-$475k - a meaningful premium over general robotics/automation roles.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
ssantos
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:03 am

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by ssantos »

From what I've seen: Remote work remains genuinely limited for most hands-on humanoid hardware roles, given the need for physical access to robots and test environments, though software-only roles (simulation, perception algorithms, offline learning) increasingly do offer remote or hybrid arrangements.
they/them
forgesve15
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2026 4:32 am

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by forgesve15 »

New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious - A field-deployment or reliability engineer's day-to-day work leans much more toward diagnosing real-world failure patterns, managing spare-parts logistics, and working directly with the customer site than toward algorithm development - a genuinely different role than a lot of new grads expect going in.
chenperez
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:51 pm

Re: Anyone negotiate equity vs salary at an early-stage humanoid startup - lessons learned?

Post by chenperez »

@forgesve15 This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. The common academic path into this field is a master's or conversion course in robotics or machine learning, followed by an internship or research role at a known lab or company - a PhD is common but increasingly not strictly required for industry roles, especially on the applied engineering side. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Building > buying.
Post Reply