Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
@jhansen This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for.
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
he/him
-
camila.jackson0
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
@kwilliams +1 to this. Worth adding:
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Building > buying.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Short answer:
Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
she/her
-
williams84
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
From hands-on experience,
Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
-
scott.andersson5
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
@williams84 I see it a little differently.
Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
@matthew43 Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent:
Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
he/him
Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?
Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong -
Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
Anyway, good thread - following for more.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days