Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by kwilliams »

@jhansen This is exactly the kind of context I was looking for. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
he/him
camila.jackson0
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by camila.jackson0 »

@kwilliams +1 to this. Worth adding: Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Building > buying.
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by park44 »

Short answer: Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
she/her
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by williams84 »

From hands-on experience, Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
scott.andersson5
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by scott.andersson5 »

@williams84 I see it a little differently. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by matthew43 »

Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by kwilliams »

@matthew43 Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent: Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
he/him
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: Cycloidal drives in humanoid joints - underused or overhyped?

Post by yuki71 »

Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Anyway, good thread - following for more.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply