Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
mia.weber
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:38 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by mia.weber »

@matthew43 Minor factual note: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by jhansen »

@mia.weber Speaking from personal experience here, Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by servoken70 »

Pretty much this. One thing to add: For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by nicole57 »

@servoken70 Ran into exactly this myself. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
deborahperez
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by deborahperez »

Sorry if this is a basic question, but Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by scott21 »

@deborahperez I dealt with almost this exact situation. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
she/her
deborah59
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:37 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by deborah59 »

@scott21 Agreed, and I'd add: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by mia_lars »

@deborah59 Slightly off-topic, but related: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by pierregreen »

@mia_lars Small correction on one detail: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
she/her
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by emilyperez »

Slight correction, though the overall point stands: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Post Reply