Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by kwilliams »

Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
he/him
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by emilyperez »

Minor factual note: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by scott21 »

Minor factual note: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by barbara50 »

@scott21 Here's what I know on this: Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
choi98
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:32 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by choi98 »

@barbara50 I dealt with almost this exact situation. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by park44 »

@choi98 Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
she/her
rossi30
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:49 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by rossi30 »

This raises a question for me - It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by scott21 »

@rossi30 Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
she/her
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by emilyperez »

Small correction on one detail: Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: Best way to test for backlash in a used/secondhand actuator?

Post by matthew43 »

I see it a little differently. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply