Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
williams84
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:50 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by williams84 »

@deborahperez Speaking from personal experience here, Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by byang »

Genuinely curious - Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by charlesbianchi »

@byang One nitpick - Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
she/her
byang
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by byang »

@charlesbianchi Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
charlesbianchi
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:51 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by charlesbianchi »

Agreed, and I'd add: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
she/her
garcia51
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by garcia51 »

@charlesbianchi Speaking from personal experience here, Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
they/them
ssantos
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:03 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by ssantos »

@garcia51 I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
they/them
diego.moore6
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu May 08, 2025 8:48 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by diego.moore6 »

@ssantos Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Building > buying.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by young56 »

This matches something I went through recently. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
jessica_faro
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Best practices for actuator bench testing before installing in a full robot?

Post by jessica_faro »

@young56 Appreciate the detailed answer. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
they/them
Post Reply