What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
james15
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:39 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by james15 »

I'd push back on this a bit. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
brian.campbell
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2026 3:10 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by brian.campbell »

To answer this directly: Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
gimbalmar65
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by gimbalmar65 »

@brian.campbell Speaking from personal experience here, Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by young56 »

@gimbalmar65 Speaking from personal experience here, Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
harmonicjen60
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:12 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by harmonicjen60 »

Short answer: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
ethan_fisc
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:36 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by ethan_fisc »

Agreed, and I'd add: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
gimbalmar65
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2025 4:14 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by gimbalmar65 »

This is a great summary, thanks. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
sarah.santos3
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:30 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by sarah.santos3 »

From hands-on experience, Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
they/them
james15
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:39 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by james15 »

Tangent, but worth mentioning: Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: What's the current best-in-class power density number you've actually verified?

Post by scott21 »

Related question - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
she/her
Post Reply