What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
matthew.yamamoto0
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2025 8:43 pm

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by matthew.yamamoto0 »

@ethan17 This matches what I've seen too. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
sarah.santos3
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:30 am

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by sarah.santos3 »

@matthew.yamamoto0 Small correction on one detail: It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
they/them
james15
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:39 am

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by james15 »

@sarah.santos3 Just to be precise about one thing: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
ethan.lewis5
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:35 pm

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by ethan.lewis5 »

@james15 One nitpick - A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
young56
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:26 pm

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by young56 »

From hands-on experience, A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
rao91
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2025 1:55 am

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by rao91 »

Not to derail, but this reminds me of something adjacent: Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
he/him
betty.king
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:37 am

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by betty.king »

Sorry if this is a basic question, but Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
sven.smith4
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:48 pm

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by sven.smith4 »

Agreed, and I'd add: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
harmonicjen60
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:12 am

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by harmonicjen60 »

Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
scott.andersson5
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:39 pm

Re: What torque sensor accuracy is actually achievable at low cost?

Post by scott.andersson5 »

Yeah, this tracks with what I've read as well. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Post Reply