How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
deborahperez
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2024 4:22 am

Re: How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Post by deborahperez »

@omar.farouk I dealt with almost this exact situation. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
park44
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:03 am

Re: How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Post by park44 »

@deborahperez I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
she/her
carol38
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 am

Re: How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Post by carol38 »

@park44 Speaking from personal experience here, Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
greta78
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2026 8:34 pm

Re: How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Post by greta78 »

@carol38 I dealt with almost this exact situation. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
joseph31
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2026 4:33 pm

Re: How much does connector reliability actually contribute to field failures?

Post by joseph31 »

@greta78 I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop.
he/him
Post Reply