Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
emily.walker2
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2026 7:53 pm

Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by emily.walker2 »

Ran into this exact question at work this week and wanted a sanity check. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon. Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control. What's everyone else's take?
Building > buying.
barbara_liu
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:08 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by barbara_liu »

@emily.walker2 Small correction on one detail: Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery.
they/them
rtorres
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2026 1:31 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by rtorres »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid. It's common for a single humanoid to mix actuator types by joint - harmonic drives or hybrid geared actuators at the hips and shoulders where sustained torque matters most, and lower-ratio QDD-style actuators at ankles and knees where backdrivability and impact tolerance matter more.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
betty.king
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2025 8:37 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by betty.king »

Still learning the space, so correct me if wrong - Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
kwilliams
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:57 pm

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by kwilliams »

@betty.king This matches what I've seen too. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
he/him
jessica_faro
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 5:26 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by jessica_faro »

This raises a question for me - Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
they/them
karen.chen3
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2025 1:30 pm

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by karen.chen3 »

@jessica_faro Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
they/them
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by emilyperez »

@karen.chen3 I'd take that specific number with a grain of salt, honestly. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
timothy.roberts2
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2026 2:26 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by timothy.roberts2 »

@emilyperez Slight correction, though the overall point stands: Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
servoken70
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Best resources for learning actuator design from scratch?

Post by servoken70 »

Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
Post Reply