How much weight do wiring and connectors actually add per joint?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
barbara_liu
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 7:08 am

Re: How much weight do wiring and connectors actually add per joint?

Post by barbara_liu »

@novikova63 Side note that might be relevant: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
they/them
matthew43
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:18 am

Re: How much weight do wiring and connectors actually add per joint?

Post by matthew43 »

@barbara_liu Side note that might be relevant: Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
vyoung
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2026 12:05 pm

Re: How much weight do wiring and connectors actually add per joint?

Post by vyoung »

@matthew43 Ran into exactly this myself. Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Post Reply