Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
joseph.robinson
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2026 11:59 am

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by joseph.robinson »

@charlesbianchi From hands-on experience, Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
jonathan.rao1
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:58 pm

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by jonathan.rao1 »

Follow-up question though - Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash.
Currently: 3D printing my way to bankruptcy.
aliu
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2026 6:16 am

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by aliu »

This raises a question for me - Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Kind of makes me think about how different this all looked even three years ago.
she/her
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@aliu Small correction on one detail: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
pierregreen
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2024 11:01 am

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by pierregreen »

Appreciate the detailed answer. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
she/her
smuller
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2026 3:29 pm

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by smuller »

I'll believe the stronger version of that claim when it's independently verified. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
emilyperez
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:03 pm

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by emilyperez »

@smuller From what I've seen: For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
sven.wilson4
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:27 pm

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by sven.wilson4 »

That's the official framing, at least - reality tends to lag a bit. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
vyoung
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2026 12:05 pm

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by vyoung »

Ran into exactly this myself. Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables. Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity.
carter42
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2025 12:10 am

Re: Anyone compared noise levels across actuator types in a real room?

Post by carter42 »

@vyoung Not sure I fully agree here. Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees.
Post Reply