How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Harmonic drives, quasi-direct drive, series elastic actuators, motor selection, gearing, and everything that makes joints move.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

This has been on my mind since a conversation I had last week. Cycloidal drives are a less common but real alternative to harmonic drives - lower cost at high ratios, decent efficiency, but historically bulkier for the same torque density, which is part of why they haven't fully displaced harmonic drives in commercial hips and knees. Anti-backlash techniques in production actuators range from mechanical preloading (spring-loaded gear meshes) to purely software compensation that models and corrects for known backlash in the control loop. Feel free to tell me I'm overthinking this.
scott21
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2024 9:57 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by scott21 »

Just to be precise about one thing: A lot of the per-joint cost in a modern actuator isn't the motor - it's the combination of a precision gearbox, integrated encoders, torque sensing, and the driver electronics, all of which have to fit inside a housing the size of a fist. This whole thread is a good reminder how young this field still is.
she/her
sarah.santos3
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:30 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by sarah.santos3 »

@scott21 Minor factual note: Encoder resolution requirements scale with how tightly you need to control low-speed motion - coarse encoders are fine for open-loop swing phases but cause visible stutter during precise placement or fine force control.
they/them
nicole57
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:29 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by nicole57 »

@sarah.santos3 Just to be precise about one thing: Harmonic drives use high reduction ratios (often around 100:1), which gives excellent force density, stiffness, and thermal endurance for continuous-duty lifting - the tradeoff is low backdrivability and some backlash. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
she/her | grad student, biped locomotion
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by mia_lars »

This lines up with my experience. Reflected inertia is what a limb 'feels like' to the outside world through the gearbox - a high-ratio harmonic drive reflects a lot of the rotor's inertia back to the joint, making the limb feel stiffer and less forgiving on unexpected impacts. For dynamic walking and recovery, joint control bandwidth in the tens of Hz range is typically necessary to react to a stumble before the center of mass gets too far outside the support polygon.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
yuki71
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:05 pm

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by yuki71 »

New to this, so forgive me if this is obvious - Boston Dynamics' commercial electric Atlas switched fully from hydraulic to QDD-style electric actuation, ending up quieter and lighter with comparable or better dynamic performance than the old hydraulic platform. Field-oriented control (FOC) tuning directly affects how smooth torque output feels - poorly tuned current loops show up as audible whine and jerky low-speed motion, while well-tuned FOC can make even a geared actuator feel fairly fluid.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
camila.jackson0
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:27 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by camila.jackson0 »

@yuki71 Worth being a little skeptical of the marketing angle here. Backdrivability is the property that lets an external force move a joint without destroying the gearbox or the motor - it's central to both safe human-robot contact and to letting a leg comply naturally when the robot stumbles.
Building > buying.
benjaminsanchez
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:58 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by benjaminsanchez »

@camila.jackson0 Small correction on one detail: Series elastic actuators add a spring element in series with the drivetrain, which gives cheap, precise torque sensing (measure spring deflection) and passive shock absorption, at the cost of reduced control bandwidth and added complexity. Makes me wonder how this looks in another five years.
barbara50
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2024 12:19 pm

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by barbara50 »

@benjaminsanchez Here's the relevant bit as far as I understand it: Motor cogging torque (the 'notchy' feel from magnet-to-slot interactions) shows up as small periodic torque ripple that can translate into visible joint jitter at low speeds - it's usually mitigated with skewed magnets, better current control, or software compensation tables.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
zoeanderson
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:39 am

Re: How are people cooling actuators packed that densely?

Post by zoeanderson »

@barbara50 Here's what I know on this: Quasi-direct drive (QDD) actuators use lower gear ratios (roughly 6:1 to 10:1) paired with high-torque-density motors, trading some peak force density for backdrivability and low reflected inertia, which matters a lot for impact tolerance and fall recovery. Torque sensing is frequently integrated directly into the actuator housing via strain gauges near the output flange or spring element, rather than bolted on as an external sensor, to save weight and reduce noise from mechanical slop.
Post Reply