What's the biggest perception failure mode you've personally debugged?
Re: What's the biggest perception failure mode you've personally debugged?
+1 to this. Worth adding:
Estimating joint torque from motor current draw is cheap and requires no extra sensor, but it's less accurate than a dedicated torque sensor because it doesn't capture friction losses through the gearbox - good enough for coarse control, not always for precise force-controlled tasks.
Totally unrelated but has anyone else noticed how fast component costs are dropping this year.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
-
ronald.clark
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2026 9:05 am
Re: What's the biggest perception failure mode you've personally debugged?
@matthew43 Same conclusion I've come to. Also worth noting:
SLAM in a working warehouse is harder than in a controlled lab mainly because the map keeps changing - pallets move, people walk through, lighting shifts near dock doors - so a lot of production systems lean on semi-static maps refreshed periodically rather than pure continuous SLAM. Depth sensing range and reliability both degrade outdoors in direct sunlight for most structured-light and active stereo cameras, since the ambient IR washes out the projected pattern - it's a real limitation for humanoids intended for anything beyond indoor, controlled environments.
-
robertmiller
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2026 4:05 pm
Re: What's the biggest perception failure mode you've personally debugged?
Genuinely curious -
Sensor fusion mostly earns its keep by covering for each individual sensor's weaknesses - vision struggles with occlusion and lighting, IMUs drift, force/torque sensors are noisy at low loads - fusing them gives a more robust estimate than any one source alone, independent of raw compute.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.