Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

End effectors, dexterous hands, tendon drives, tactile fingertips, grasp planning, and teleoperation.
carlossanchez
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 1:44 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by carlossanchez »

@scott21 Can I ask a dumb follow-up - Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
"Torque is a lifestyle."
rossi30
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 7:49 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by rossi30 »

Tangent, but worth mentioning: Compliant wrists that absorb impact during a bad approach or misjudged contact reduce mechanical stress on the whole arm, which matters a lot for long-term reliability even though it's a less visible feature than the hand itself. In-hand reorientation (repositioning a grasped object without setting it down) is one of the more advanced manipulation skills, requiring either a highly dexterous hand with enough DoF or clever use of gravity and controlled slipping - it's an active research area rather than a solved problem.
"The best actuator is the one that doesn't overheat."
deborah59
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:37 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by deborah59 »

Counterpoint: Underactuated hands (fewer actuators than joints, using mechanical coupling to shape the grasp) are a reasonable engineering compromise for robust power grasps on a budget, but they generally can't do fine in-hand manipulation the way a fully actuated hand can. Object occlusion by the robot's own hand during the final approach to a grasp is a common and annoying perception problem - the closer the hand gets to a good grasp position, the more it blocks the camera's view of exactly what it's about to grab.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
choi98
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2024 12:32 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by choi98 »

Here's what I know on this: Palm sensing gets less attention than fingertip sensing, but a lot of power grasps (holding a box, a tool handle) rely more on palm and lateral finger contact than fingertip contact, so under-sensing the palm can leave a real blind spot in grasp confidence.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
jhansen
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:27 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by jhansen »

Genuine beginner question - Cable routing through a wrist joint with multiple degrees of freedom is a genuinely tricky mechanical design problem - tendons and wiring both need enough slack to avoid binding through the full range of motion without tangling or fraying over thousands of cycles.
cynthia.muller
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2025 8:23 pm

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by cynthia.muller »

@jhansen From hands-on experience, Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
Opinions my own, not my employer's.
mia_lars
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2024 11:00 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by mia_lars »

@cynthia.muller Respectfully, I think this undersells it a bit. Grasp planning for deformable or non-rigid objects (bags, cables, cloth) remains one of the genuinely unsolved problems in manipulation - rigid-body grasp models simply don't capture how the object will behave once contact starts.
Watching this space closely since 2019.
deborah59
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:37 am

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by deborah59 »

I don't think that's quite right, for what it's worth. Wet, oily, or otherwise low-friction objects are still a genuine edge case for most current hands, since tactile sensing and grasp-force controllers are typically tuned and validated on dry, higher-friction test objects. Reminds me a bit of the early drone hobbyist scene, honestly.
Ex-automotive, now full-time robots.
jwang
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:28 pm

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by jwang »

This matches something I went through recently. Tendon-driven fingers let you move the heavier actuators back into the palm or forearm, keeping the fingers themselves light and fast, but they introduce cable routing, tensioning, and long-term wear problems that direct-actuated fingers don't have.
barbara.jones
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 6:12 pm

Re: Anyone quantified how grasp success rate changes with lighting conditions?

Post by barbara.jones »

Just to be precise about one thing: Imitation learning from human demonstration video (without robot teleoperation data) is an appealing way to scale up training data cheaply, but it runs into the embodiment gap - human hand kinematics and force profiles don't map directly onto a robot hand's very different mechanism.
he/him | robotics hobbyist since the DARPA Grand Challenge days
Post Reply